In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, content creators and SEO professionals rely heavily on artificial intelligence-powered tools to streamline their workflows and boost their search engine rankings. One such game-changing AI technology is ChatGPT, designed to assist in content generation, research, and website optimization. However, with a plethora of SEO plugins available for ChatGPT, selecting the right one can be crucial to achieving desired results.
In this blog post, we will be comparing four popular ChatGPT SEO plugins – SEO.app, Web Pilot, SEO Core AI, and SEO Tool (Important) – to determine which plugin is the best overall for keyword extraction, content research, and website optimization. We will also be sharing our findings based on several tests we conducted.
So, without further ado, let’s dive into our first plugin comparison: SEO.app.
Plugin #1: SEO.app
Ranking factors comparison
For our first test prompt across all plugins, we asked each one to provide us with the ranking factors necessary to outrank the top-ranking blog post for the keyword “how to brew coffee at home.” Our goal was to determine which plugin could deliver the most valuable information based on minimal input.
The output we received from SEO.app was quite satisfying. It provided actionable recommendations on keyword optimization, related semantic indexing, emotional appeal, content length, readability score, and competitor analysis. The plugin also generated a target word count and meta description tailored to our specific keyword. This level of detail and usefulness puts SEO.app in a favorable position compared to other plugins.
Related keywords comparison
In our second test prompt, we requested a list of related keywords, LSI keywords, and variations of keywords for the main term “how to run Facebook ads.” We also asked for an easy-to-read table with the keywords’ estimated search volume and keyword difficulty.
SEO.app generated a well-structured table comprising our main keyword, related keywords, their estimated search volumes, and keyword difficulty metrics. This output proves the plugin’s ability to provide intuitive, detailed information that can be readily used in content planning and optimization.
URL content extraction comparison
In our third test prompt, we aimed to evaluate each plugin’s capacity for extracting content from a URL and offering specific recommendations to outrank competitors. We asked the plugins to read a given URL and provide detailed advice on how to outrank the website for the keyword “best AI apps of 2023.”
SEO.app performed admirably, presenting us with essential ranking factors such as keyword optimization, LSI keywords, emotional appeal, content length, competitor analysis, meta keywords, and a meta description. This output showed the plugin’s capability to deliver actionable suggestions with precision.
Overall, SEO.app has demonstrated impressive results in all three tests, providing specific insights and recommendations that can be easily applied to real-world optimization efforts. Its intuitive and detailed outputs make it a strong contender among the four plugins.
Plugin #2: Web Pilot
Ranking factors comparison
When we tested Web Pilot with the same initial prompt used for SEO.app, the plugin delivered decent content that included keyword optimization metrics, quality content, backlinks, social signals, and on-page and off-page SEO. However, the output seemed more generic compared to SEO.app and lacked the detailed insights required for a more tailored approach to outrank competitors.
Related keywords comparison
For the second test prompt, Web Pilot encountered some difficulties. Initially, it informed us that it could not provide any real-time data on keyword metrics due to restricted internet access. We had to modify the prompt to request estimations instead of real-time data.
Upon doing so, Web Pilot generated a table with keyword information. However, it did not match the seamless experience provided by SEO.app, which produced the required output using the original prompt without any adjustments.
URL content extraction comparison
When testing Web Pilot for its ability to extract content from a URL and offer specific recommendations, the output was quite similar to that of SEO.app in structure. However, the provided information remained general and lacked the depth necessary to effectively outrank competitors based on our given keyword.
Plugin #3: SEO Core AI
Ranking factors comparison
The output generated by SEO Core AI for the first test prompt closely resembled that of Web Pilot. It did not bring anything new or unique to the table, and similarly provided a more generic analysis of ranking factors.
Related keywords comparison
Like Web Pilot, SEO Core AI struggled with the second test prompt, initially informing us that it could not provide real-time data on keyword metrics. After adjusting the prompt to request estimations, the plugin generated a keyword table that was comparable to what Web Pilot provided – but still not as intuitive as the table produced by SEO.app.
URL content extraction comparison
Upon evaluating SEO Core AI’s performance in extracting content from a URL and offering tailored recommendations, the output showed some improvements compared to Web Pilot. The plugin presented more in-depth suggestions regarding word count, headers, and technical SEO recommendations. However, it still fell short of the level of detail and usefulness provided by SEO.app.
Plugin #4: SEO Tool (Important)
Ranking factors comparison
The outcome of the first test prompt with SEO Tool (Important) followed a similar pattern as the other plugins, offering generic information about the ranking factors required to outrank competitors.
Related keywords comparison
SEO Tool (Important) faced the same issue as both Web Pilot and SEO Core AI when it came to our second test prompt, informing us that it could not access real-time data to generate the desired output.
URL content extraction comparison
In the final test, SEO Tool (Important) delivered an output similar to the other plugins, providing keyword optimization metrics and basic recommendations for outranking competitors. It did not stand out in terms of offering in-depth advice or unique insights.
Winner: SEO.app
Based on our tests and comparisons, we have concluded that SEO.app emerges as the best ChatGPT SEO plugin among the four contenders. It consistently provided more intuitive and detailed outputs across all three test prompts. Its ability to generate actionable insights and recommendations gives it a clear advantage over Web Pilot, SEO Core AI, and SEO Tool (Important).
While the other plugins offered some valuable input, they often required prompt adjustments and failed to provide the level of depth and specificity found in SEO.app’s outputs. The user-friendly nature of SEO.app’s results, as well as its ability to deliver information without needing prompt modifications, further solidifies its position as the top choice for ChatGPT SEO optimization.
Conclusion
Although our tests indicate that SEO.app stands out as the best ChatGPT SEO plugin in this comparison, it’s essential to recognize that different plugins may cater to specific user requirements and unique use cases. Therefore, it’s crucial to explore various plugins and determine which one works best for your specific needs.
As the world of ChatGPT and SEO tools continues to evolve, we can expect further advancements and improvements in these plugins, potentially leading to even more sophisticated and precise outputs. In the meantime, don’t hesitate to experiment with different plugins to find the perfect fit for your content creation and optimization efforts.
Call to Action
We’d love to hear your thoughts on these ChatGPT SEO plugins! Have you tried any of them, or do you have a favorite we haven’t covered? Share your experiences and recommendations in the comments section below.
